Fast Stats

I have a very controversial article that I originally wrote for Blog of Fusion. I may still post it here, but it looks like it'll be a Fusion Authority article instead. In its place I'd posting up some stats for House of Fusion as seen through Google Analytics. As a note, I'm using round numbers here. Usually rounded down.

The first and most important statistic to me is the people. Using strict Google numbers, House of Fusion has had over 825,000 Absolute Unique Visitors since the beginning of the year. These visitors are broken down into 1,075,000 visits and 1,775,000 page views. This in turn breaks down into 815,000 visitors who came once and did not return and 250,000 visitors who did. As House of Fusion excels in its mailing lists, it is expected that people don't come to the site very often as they get it all in their email.

While the site visitor information is nice to look at, it really doesn't help you that much. Lets look at some numbers for the last week that will be of use.

Of all the visitors, only 2.9% did not have Flash installed. 84% had Flash 8 or higher and 28% had Flash 9. Because I use a 95% threshold to determine if a stat covers just about everyone, I have to assume that If/When I add Flash content to the site, it should be targeted to Flash 7 or make it easy to upgrade to the latest version.

On the browser side, 61% of the visitors were using IE with over 99% of them on IE 6 or above and 33.5% used Firefox. Again, this tells me that I can code the site using as close to modern standards as I'd like. No worries about older versions of IE or Netscape. They're just not statistically significant as a sample.

Now here's the statistic that is really important to me. Only 3% of the site users are on an 800x600 resolution. In contrast, over 95% are on a 1024x768. This means I can code the UI of the site to this larger size. But wait, it gets better. A little over 43% of my visitors are using a 1024 or wider resolution. This means I have 'extra' space for content that will be seen by almost half of my visitors. Not a place to put important things like site nav, but things like latest blog posts, list threads and the like will fit here perfectly. And because it's on the page, Google will see it and it'll help raise the profile of the page.

The last statistic shows why I focus so much on Google for Search Engine Optimization and the like. Of all visits to the site, 85% are coming from a Google link. Only 5% are coming from a Yahoo link and another 5% are coming direct. This means that whatever I can do to make Google 'like' my site better, the more traffic I can expect.

I'm going to try and keep a running log of the House of Fusion stats on the House of Fusion Statistics page. This will go far in showing that House of Fusion is growing and this implies that ColdFusion is growing as well. It will also allow you to see the changes in data over time. Watching the resolution numbers shift more and more to larger screens lets you be ready when you hit your threshold and you have to do a site redesign to make use of the extra room.

For those who want to get their own numbers, just sign up for a Google Analytics account. If you can't get in due to Google being overwhelmed by responses, you can 'cheat' by setting yourself up with a Google AdWords account, which gives direct access to Analytics as part of the setup. Need to set up an AdWords account? Click on the button below:

Google AdWord's biggest problem

I'm going through my referer logs to see why my adword costs are so high and the answer is clear as day; spam sites.

Basically, someone sets up a site with some targetted key words and then puts it out to get people to come in and when they don't see any content, they click on an ad. Either that or they have someone click on the ad for them.

Either way, it's a waste of money. The problem? Unless you look at your referer logs, you have NO CLUE AT ALL where an ad click comes from. This is my biggest problem with adwords. Because Google will not give me the info, I have to try and get it myself.

To make it worse, Google seems to only give you like 10% of the referers. The excuse is that not all browsers give referer information. BS! If I'm displaying 100 ads a day, I expect at least 80% of the people to have a browser and system that will give me the referer. I expect to see where an ad is shown and be able to block it if it is not a place I want my ad shown.

And this is only if I expect to get the information through the referer. Google has a VERY GOOD idea as to where the ad was shown, who clicked it, and even what they were wearing at the time. Why can't I have that information? (except for the person's dressing habits)

And it gets even worse than that. When I asked Google to block my ads from oingo.com (which is now owned by Google), they went ahead and listed the domain in my block list but still show my ads on it. What site on it? A parked (i.e. spam) site.

In Google's defense, when I complained about something like this in the past they gave me a refund of a certain amount of money so at least they recognise the problem and want to be 'nice'. Personally, I'd rather have a Google based list of every site that shows my ads and/or every site that generated a click. If I'm spending a few hundred dollars a month on advertising, I'd like to be sure my money is being well spent.

And how in the world did one of my ColdFusion ads get on the site of Red Hot Chili Peppers guitarist John Frusciante? I guess he just loves ColdFusion at heart. :)

BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9. Contact Blog Owner
House of Fusion | ColdFusion Jobs @ House of Fusion | Fusion Authority