Discredited magazine publisher at war with Adobe

A discredited and SYStematically CONniving magazine publisher has fired yet another salvo at Adobe today in their usual manner. This involves taking a blog post, re-branding it as coming from their "news desk" and altering the title to fit their vendetta. The post in question was BlueDragon Open Source - Launch Date Announced by Alan Williamson about how the New Atlanta team is working hard to get a public release ready for display at cf.Objective() 2008. Informative and straight forward. The re-branded version had the same title with a single alteration, a prefix of "ColdFusion Killer".

At no time did Alan say anything about the open source BlueDragon being a ColdFusion killer. It's not something that's been said by anyone...other than the publisher in question.

Really guys, this is getting old and stale. Just because Adobe stopped advertising with you doesn't mean you have to commit fraud to get back at them. Lame.

How to lie: A case study

Lying is easy. Lying is fun. Lying is profitable. Lying is the way of life for those who want to hide the truth. The question is, how do you lie effectively? Let's look at an example of the best techniques in action. The company using these techniques at the moment does not have to be named.

The first thing you do when lying is to tell the truth -- not the whole truth, but just enough to make the lie itself seem true - a half or quarter truth. Truth: "I hate the auto-movie ads on the site as they blow my ears off or disturb everyone around me. The intrusive pop-ups are also a problem" Lie: "Michael Dinowitz doesn't want any ads on the site"

The second thing is to quote a person. Using some abstract entity in a lie is too impersonal. You need to give the lie a human face, make it feel like it's "one of us". Adobe is a massive company and is just too big and abstract for anyone to take personally. On the other hand, Michael Dinowitz and Sean Corfield are both people who can be identified with.

This brings us to the third point of a lie: Use named, recognizable people. You can use anyone you want in a lie to help make the lie more believable but if you use people whose names are well known in a community, then your lie becomes more personal and therefore, more believable. If you combine this with a half-truth (see point one) that might be heard from these people, then all the better. You don't even have to have the half-truth come from both as long as you group the people together. This makes the lie seem even more real as "they are both saying it," even though neither did.

Finally, take a disparaging quote against the named people from someone else and don't allow the quote to be challenged. This is the most powerful technique, especially if you can make the person quoted seem like an expert. He doesn't have to be, as most people don't bother to investigate who said what.

Oh, I almost forgot an important technique. Make your lie fit into a lie told by someone else. This falls under the theory that if something is said often enough, it is seen as true, whether it is or not. "ColdFusion is dying" is a lie told often enough to have gained a life of its own despite every fact that refutes the lie.

So there you have it. The techniques used to smear people and deflect blame. The techniques that should never be used against people who LOVE to expose lies for what they are. The techniques that fail when used against a thriving, intelligent community such as ours.

When will the company in question learn that simple fact?

Please buy Sys-Con a clue

Do you know the definition of Chutzpah? It's taking a magazine, destroying its content and quality, canceling it without warning and then saying that it's someone else's fault. Sys-Con is like an alcoholic who just can't admit they have a problem. Their latest insult to our intelligence is to try and salve our wounds by offering us a free subscription to one of their front-end technology magazines in place of their now canceled back-end technology magazine. All 17,600 subscribers to ColdFusion Developers Journal (probably 7,600 paid subscribers and 10,000 free ones) are going to get a year's subscription to either Flex Developer's Journal or Silverlight Developer's Journal.

But wait, this is not a year's subscription to a print magazine. No, that would be something akin to admitting that they've done wrong. What they're offering is a year's digital subscription to their magazine. That's right, you get the front-end technology magazine of your choice in digital format in place of the back-end technology magazine that you expected. And because Flex, Silverlight and ColdFusion are all so similar in Sys-Con's minds, they can repeat the canard that ColdFusion is dying. Of course, this is not true despite their best efforts.

Do they have any clue what these technologies are? Let me try to explain it to them in simple terms:

  1. Ug want to make computer do work
  2. Ug write back-end program to do work
  3. Ug need to make program look nice for big boss who give Ug pretty stones
  4. Ug uses pretty front-end technology to talk to back-end technology
  5. Front-end technology look nice to boss
  6. Boss not know what Ug do on back end. Boss see pretty pictures
  7. Ug know difference between front-end and back-end
  8. Ug laughs his caveman ass off for knowing what big publishing company not know
  9. Big publishing company send Ug magazines Ug not want
  10. Ug have supply of toilet paper
I really hope that helps Sys-Con understand the difference. Oh, and thank you for giving us all the new subscribers. We really appreciate it.

SYS-CON to Offer Free (digital) Subscriptions to ColdFusion Developer's Journal Readers

Fusion Authority Quarterly Update - The only ColdFusion journal in print

Sys-Con drops ColdFusion for Silverlight

Sys-Con is a printing company. They are not interested in community support. They are not interested in language advancement. They are interested in money. They are interested in enough money to print a magazine, give it away to thousands and still make a profit. Looking over the number and cost of ads in their magazine, they must want a BIG profit. And those advertising dollars are partially guaranteed by Adobe's support.

According to Sys-Con:

After ColdFusion became part of the Adobe product line Adobe recently decided to discontinue its support of the magazine.
Now from what I saw in the last issue of CFDJ from months back, there were still Adobe ads. What exactly was the support that was being cut back? One less ad? Half of the ads? All of them? Or did Adobe give them direct cash above and beyond the ads for operations? We won't know till someone from Adobe responds.

But unless Adobe was funding the ENTIRE magazine, any cut in their support should not cause it to fold. The Fusion Authority Quarterly Update isn't folding and not only don't we get direct money from Adobe, we don't even have any Adobe ads in this (and probably the next) issue.

Of course, we care about the community quite a bit more than we do money. That's why we're not a media giant like Sys-Con. But we still have our souls. In the end, I think that's what matters most.

Note one other thing missing from this press release. They are not taking any responsability for their own actions. The total lack of editorial quality, the 'borrowing' of content from other people's websites, their own website being so ad filled that nothing can be found and those freeking annoying auto-play video and popup ads. In the end many of the big names in the community had left them and moved on to other journals or websites. This is just as telling as the removal of Adobe's support.

The biggest problem here is that it looks bad for ColdFusion. The first print magazine dedicated to it has left the building. Now rather than a ColdFusion magazine and a ColdFusion journal, there's only a journal. The very fact that they're moving the magazine from ColdFusion, an Adobe product to Silverlight, a Microsoft product, can and will be used against ColdFusion.

For those who want to get some quality printed ColdFusion and want to ignore Sys-Con, the following journal and books are available:

To be totally self serving, if you want to buy an ad in the only print ColdFusion journal around, we would be happy to sell you one. :)

Sys-Con Press Release:
http://ajax.sys-con.com/read/426141.htm

IE 7 - Don't like it

I just installed IE 7 on my home server and tried it out. Let me say bluntly that I hate it. The UI is very different and I don't seem to have any option to move bars around. No, I don't mean the 'extra' bars like the Google toolbar or links. I'm talking about the standard toolbars that every browser has and needs. The file/edit/view options are not on top where they are in just about every Microsoft product. The home/page and other buttons are thrown all the way down and to the right of the new tab bar and the url entry form is right on top. This configuration sucks.

Maybe I'm totally wrong. Maybe Microsoft spent a billion dollars to poll average, non-programming people and found out that this is the layout they want. Maybe this is better for productivity in a business environment. Maybe I'm just in User Interface shock because of the radical change.

Bottom line is that I'm really not impressed and I doubt that the people who visit my site will be either. I've seen a very stead shrinking of the IE marketshare and this new version of IE feels very much too little, too late.

BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9. Contact Blog Owner
House of Fusion | ColdFusion Jobs @ House of Fusion | Fusion Authority