<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			
			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>Blog of Fusion - Frameworks</title>
			<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com</link>
			<description>ColdFusion Blogs</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:11:39 -0400</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:15:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>mdinowit@houseoffusion.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>mdinowit@houseoffusion.com</webMaster>
			
			<item>
				<title>My Fusebox application upgrade experience</title>
				<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com/010710-my-fusebox-application-upgrade-experience.cfm</link>
				<description>
				
				I&apos;m doing an integration and upgrade on a Fusebox application which has passed through at least 2 other developers, both of whom I know. There are a few things in the code which look &apos;wrong&apos; to me but they work. My rule is, if it works, don&apos;t rewrite...
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Frameworks</category>				
				
				<category>Fusebox</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.blogoffusion.com/010710-my-fusebox-application-upgrade-experience.cfm</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>Wrong ColdFusion Religion</title>
				<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com/051709-wrong-coldfusion-religion.cfm</link>
				<description>
				
				
This is a realization that has been thrust upon me over the years. I belong to the wrong ColdFusion religion. My religion is that ColdFusion was designed for clean, understandable applications written in a quick and easy style by people of all leve...
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Coding</category>				
				
				<category>Frameworks</category>				
				
				<category>OOP</category>				
				
				<category>Opinion</category>				
				
				<category>Rant</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 16:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.blogoffusion.com/051709-wrong-coldfusion-religion.cfm</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>Mach-II: My Final Words</title>
				<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com/022707-machii-my-final-words.cfm</link>
				<description>
				
				I&apos;ve been a little gun shy about posting recently. I stopped responding to a post about the use of the This scope. I did not follow up on the arguments for/against my actions with Mach-II. I did not follow up on anything because I got some rather neg...
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Coding</category>				
				
				<category>Frameworks</category>				
				
				<category>Opinion</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.blogoffusion.com/022707-machii-my-final-words.cfm</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>What I did to Mach II</title>
				<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com/013107-what-i-did-to-mach-ii.cfm</link>
				<description>
				
				
There has been a lot of interest in the steps I took to optimize my client&apos;s website. The main interest was in what I did to Mach II in order to speed it up, especially as Mach II is rather optimized to start with. The answer is to cheat.


If y...
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Optimization</category>				
				
				<category>Best Practices</category>				
				
				<category>Frameworks</category>				
				
				<category>Coding</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.blogoffusion.com/013107-what-i-did-to-mach-ii.cfm</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>I don&apos;t hate Mach II</title>
				<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com/013107-i-dont-hate-mach-ii.cfm</link>
				<description>
				
				
I was doing a remote presentation last night on &quot;Object Orienter Programming for ColdFusion Developers&quot; and it eventually moved over to the topic of optimizing ColdFusion Components. While I was showing what I do for speed, I relayed a story about ...
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Optimization</category>				
				
				<category>Best Practices</category>				
				
				<category>Frameworks</category>				
				
				<category>OOP</category>				
				
				<category>Coding</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.blogoffusion.com/013107-i-dont-hate-mach-ii.cfm</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>FAQ-U 2 - OOP for CF and Frameworks</title>
				<link>http://www.blogoffusion.com/113006-faqu-12--oop-for-cf-and-frameworks.cfm</link>
				<description>
				
				Yep, the second issue of the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update is not only in my hand, it&apos;s packed and ready to go to all subscribers. But of course, anyone who subscribes before the end of the year gets this issue as well as the previous one in PDF ...
				
				</description>
				
				<category>Coding</category>				
				
				<category>Fusion Authority Quarterly Update</category>				
				
				<category>Frameworks</category>				
				
				<category>CFC</category>				
				
				<category>OOP</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.blogoffusion.com/113006-faqu-12--oop-for-cf-and-frameworks.cfm</guid>
				
			</item>
			</channel></rss>